Editing Category talk:Tools
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
: I think it depends on a case-by-case basis. E.g. in case of the Apple Watch there are different series which differ slightly in the kinds of sensors they include, but the overall form factor & features are quite similar and new sensors in more recent series are mostly additive. In that case a single page with maybe a table of sensors per series would be sufficient. | : I think it depends on a case-by-case basis. E.g. in case of the Apple Watch there are different series which differ slightly in the kinds of sensors they include, but the overall form factor & features are quite similar and new sensors in more recent series are mostly additive. In that case a single page with maybe a table of sensors per series would be sufficient. | ||
: On the other hand Fitbit has evolved a lot over time and the sensors & even form factors have changed a lot. The first Fitbit was a waistband-worn and mainly did step tracking and didn’t even have a heart rate sensor. More recent ones come as simple wrist-worn trackers up to full smartwatch features. In that case splitting it out might a better approach. - [[User:Gedankenstuecke|Gedankenstuecke]] ([[User talk:Gedankenstuecke|talk]]) 10:36, 9 November 2021 (UTC) | : On the other hand Fitbit has evolved a lot over time and the sensors & even form factors have changed a lot. The first Fitbit was a waistband-worn and mainly did step tracking and didn’t even have a heart rate sensor. More recent ones come as simple wrist-worn trackers up to full smartwatch features. In that case splitting it out might a better approach. - [[User:Gedankenstuecke|Gedankenstuecke]] ([[User talk:Gedankenstuecke|talk]]) 10:36, 9 November 2021 (UTC) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== Adding a section on usefulness of tools in different contexts? == | == Adding a section on usefulness of tools in different contexts? == | ||
A section that could be useful to understand the real-world applicability of a tool could be to add a section "This tool has been successfully used in [projects], and not in [other projects], linking internally or externally. - [[User:Katoss|Katoss]] ([[User talk:Katoss|talk]]) 10:24, 9 November 2021 (UTC) | A section that could be useful to understand the real-world applicability of a tool could be to add a section "This tool has been successfully used in [projects], and not in [other projects], linking internally or externally. - [[User:Katoss|Katoss]] ([[User talk:Katoss|talk]]) 10:24, 9 November 2021 (UTC) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||