Reasons for and against self tracking and quantification

From Personal Science Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

There is a wide array of reasons for and against engaging in self-tracking, this article provides a summary of a debate through an argument map on kialo [1].

Reasons For

Improve the management of health conditions

Doctors get much more precise, objective and detailed description than patients provide verbally. Patients get a clearer picture of their health.

Chronic health, sub-clinical problems, and effects of lifestyle choices like veganism, may be monitored using personal health tracking. Remedies such as weight loss diets and melatonin can be tested for effectiveness with self health tracking. Unfortunately, sub-clinical issues are often esoteric and so require elusive or underdeveloped tools.

Motivate behavior change

Gamification seems pretty popular and it requires tracking. Most consumer wearables include lots of motivating information. Just watching the numbers improve or be recorded can be quite motivating and build healthy habits; according to personal experience DG (talk) and Atomic Habits book. Problems usually have easier solutions than just relying on willpower such as a way to make a necessary habit much more fun or that underneath the problem is a health issue.

Optimize health, productivity, education, sports training, and cognitive functioning.

Professional coaches do this. QS projects have found interventions that help these like creatine for cognitive functioning.

Contribute your data to medical research.

Variety of literature shows the validity of N-of-1 approaches.

Lifelogging, Introspection

Can be fun. Store important memories.

Reasons Against and Problems

Choosing, setting up, and connecting user's selection of apps and devices can be quite a bit of work. Or expensive.

User could follow someone else's made trail such as reading this wiki instead of researching everything themselves. Custom data sources such as for rare problems that have not been documented here are still a problem. Privacy, data access, data quality are all constraints which make finding a good enough device harder.

Self tracking takes too much time and effort every day.

Manual entry is time consuming though automatic data recording is usually not. Studies and experience show people dropping even fitness trackers.

People make mistakes forget and slack when recording data manually

Self-report is a common concern in studies.

Health tracking presents privacy concerns

GPS can reveal delicate information. Same with emotion detection. Employees already monitor employee health. User has some options for defense. Data protection regulations grow.

Analysis algorithms are either hard to use or too simple

All apps besides OH with any ability to analyze just use linear regression. Just read an article in nature where ML was used on multiple N-of-1 studies but that approach was lacking and is difficult for the average user to set up.

Negative engagement of User

such as becoming obsessed with data tracking.

People do not want to know somethings

Like a genetic predisposition to a disease they can not treat.

References

Linked content on this wiki

(The content in the table below is automatically created. See Template:Topic Queries for details. If newly linked pages do not appear here, click on "More" and "Refresh".)

Tools related to this topic  
Projects related to this topic  
Self researchers related to this topic  
We talked about this topic in the following meetings  
2022-06-23 Self-Research Chat