Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | Before Though beginners should just look around the wiki and surf the links out to find basic common knowledge about a topic, often user will want to look into more detail, obscurity or to the cutting edge of science for interventions.
| + | {{Topic Infobox}} |
| + | Public knowledge resources can make a good starting point, e.g. to identify interventions one can try and that are likely to work. This wiki can be a starting point by browsing topics of interest and visiting the links in the articles find basic common knowledge about a given topic from the perspective of health tracking. |
| | | |
− | === Knowledge Graphs ===
| + | The most reliable source of information (besides your doctor), is from the government.<ref>https://medlineplus.gov/</ref> When searching add 'site:.gov' to the end of your query. Wikipedia is less reliable. |
− | Nodes like "supplement" connecting to nodes like "disease" with an edge saying "reduces chance" to mean that some supplement reduces chance of some disease.
| |
| | | |
− | biomindmap.com<ref>[https://biomindmap.com/nodes/1399 https://biomindmap.com/nodes/620]</ref> User edited. You must read the abstracts of the papers supporting each link. The highest rated herb for improving cognition actually reduces stress.
| + | Additionally, it might be worth looking for more details or the cutting edge of science for interventions. Or maybe not?<ref>https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/fFY2HeC9i2Tx8FEnK/my-resentful-story-of-becoming-a-medical-miracle</ref> Depending on the topic in question there might be communities which compile such detailed information, e.g. the communities [[Tools for Cognitive Testing|rNootropics]] and [[Diet tracking tools|rNutrition]] compile great lists of research conducted and advice. Formal research papers are difficult. Search for metanalyses because they are a compilation of other studies. Use advanced search tools like ontologies.<ref>www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/68008568</ref> Depending on the topic and specific question, it may be bad to rely solely on epidemiological studies without looking at other types of studies.<ref>https://old.reddit.com/r/nutrition/comments/tby2ye/about_scientific_studies_on_nutrition_from_a/</ref> |
| | | |
− | ====== Biomedical Knowledge Graphs<ref>https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.12.21253461v3.full</ref> ======
| + | See also [[Resources]] |
− | More for serious researchers, doctors and precision medicine than Personal Science. These graph databases mention their sources of information like "clinicaltrials.gov".
| |
| | | |
− | * Hetionet<ref>https://het.io/search/?source=15633&target=26528&metapaths=BPpGaDrD%2CBPpGuD&complete=</ref> | + | == Papers == |
| + | https://www.lens.org |
| + | |
| + | chatgpt's scholarai |
| + | |
| + | https://elicit.org GPT-3 Powered. Transforms every sentence into every other relevant sentence so user does not need to rephrase anything. Also gives the exact sentence that answers the user's question. |
| + | |
| + | * What is the impact of creatine on cognition? |
| + | * Does mindfulness improve decision-making? |
| + | * What are the effects of sleep training on infants? |
| + | consensus.app like elicit. will also suggest citations for your statements. |
| + | |
| + | https://www.semanticscholar.org the backend for consensus and elicit. |
| + | |
| + | https://www.scinapse.io |
| + | |
| + | https://examine.com Search name of diet supplement get summary and all papers on the subject. recommended by LW guy too. |
| + | |
| + | litmaps.com network graphs of citations |
| + | |
| + | researchrabbit like litmaps |
| + | |
| + | microsoft academic graph like litmaps |
| + | |
| + | == Knowledge Graphs == |
| + | Knowledge graphs link information through triplets. Nodes can be topics like "supplement", which could be connected to a node like "disease" with an edge that says "reduces chance". This would mean that some supplement reduces chance of some disease. The biomindmap.com tool is a "collaborative knowledge manager" <ref>[https://biomindmap.com/nodes/1399 https://biomindmap.com/nodes/620]</ref>. To contribute you must read the abstracts of the papers supporting each link. Be careful though, the highest rated herb for improving cognition actually reduces stress. Curedao<ref>studies.curedao.org/variables/Cognitive_Speed_Score_From_Lumosity</ref> uses user contributed data instead of papers. |
| + | |
| + | === Biomedical Knowledge Graphs === |
| + | These knowledge graphs are designed for researchers, doctors and precision medicine<ref>https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.12.21253461v3.full</ref> and not specifically for Personal Science and might be harder to navigate. These graph databases mention their sources of information like "clinicaltrials.gov". |
| + | |
| + | * Hetionet<ref>https://het.io/search/?source=15633&target=26528&metapaths=BPpGaDrD%2CBPpGuD&complete=</ref> |
| * PreMedKB<ref>http://www.fudan-pgx.org/premedkb/index.html#/search/result?queryType=1&metaType=disease&keyword=3410</ref> | | * PreMedKB<ref>http://www.fudan-pgx.org/premedkb/index.html#/search/result?queryType=1&metaType=disease&keyword=3410</ref> |
− | * DIY hosting: Clinical Knowledge Graph<ref>https://ckg.readthedocs.io/en/latest/INTRO.html</ref> iBKH<ref>https://github.com/wcm-wanglab/iBKH</ref> | + | * Self-hosted solutions: |
| + | ** Clinical Knowledge Graph<ref>https://ckg.readthedocs.io/en/latest/INTRO.html</ref> |
| + | ** iBKH<ref>https://github.com/wcm-wanglab/iBKH</ref> |
| | | |
− | [[Category:Topics]] | + | == References == |
| + | [[Category:Experiment design]] |