Difference between revisions of "Searching public knowledge"
Bretbernhoft (talk | contribs) m (Added a couple of words and commas to help with with readability.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Before trying interventions user should look for the ones most likely to work based on public knowledge. Beginners should just look around the wiki and surf the links out to find basic common knowledge about a topic. Often user will want to look into more detail, obscurity or to the cutting edge of science for interventions. Some of the communities like [[Tools for Cognitive Testing|rNootropics]] and [[Diet tracking tools|rNutrition]] compile great lists of research conducted and advice. It may be bad to rely on Epidemiological studies without looking at other types of studies.<ref>https://old.reddit.com/r/nutrition/comments/tby2ye/about_scientific_studies_on_nutrition_from_a/</ref> | + | Before trying interventions, the user should look for the ones most likely to work, as based on public knowledge. Beginners should just look around the wiki and surf the links out to find basic common knowledge about a topic. Often user will want to look into more detail, obscurity or to the cutting edge of science for interventions. Some of the communities like [[Tools for Cognitive Testing|rNootropics]] and [[Diet tracking tools|rNutrition]] compile great lists of research conducted and advice. It may be bad to rely on Epidemiological studies without looking at other types of studies.<ref>https://old.reddit.com/r/nutrition/comments/tby2ye/about_scientific_studies_on_nutrition_from_a/</ref> |
=== Knowledge Graphs === | === Knowledge Graphs === | ||
Revision as of 02:33, 14 April 2022
Before trying interventions, the user should look for the ones most likely to work, as based on public knowledge. Beginners should just look around the wiki and surf the links out to find basic common knowledge about a topic. Often user will want to look into more detail, obscurity or to the cutting edge of science for interventions. Some of the communities like rNootropics and rNutrition compile great lists of research conducted and advice. It may be bad to rely on Epidemiological studies without looking at other types of studies.[1]
Knowledge Graphs
Nodes like "supplement" connecting to nodes like "disease" with an edge saying "reduces chance" to mean that some supplement reduces chance of some disease.
biomindmap.com[2] "collaborative knowledge manager." You must read the abstracts of the papers supporting each link. The highest rated herb for improving cognition actually reduces stress.
Biomedical Knowledge Graphs[3]
More for serious researchers, doctors and precision medicine than Personal Science. These graph databases mention their sources of information like "clinicaltrials.gov".
- ↑ https://old.reddit.com/r/nutrition/comments/tby2ye/about_scientific_studies_on_nutrition_from_a/
- ↑ https://biomindmap.com/nodes/620
- ↑ https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.12.21253461v3.full
- ↑ https://het.io/search/?source=15633&target=26528&metapaths=BPpGaDrD%2CBPpGuD&complete=
- ↑ http://www.fudan-pgx.org/premedkb/index.html#/search/result?queryType=1&metaType=disease&keyword=3410
- ↑ https://ckg.readthedocs.io/en/latest/INTRO.html
- ↑ https://github.com/wcm-wanglab/iBKH