Difference between revisions of "Searching public knowledge"
m (→Papers) |
m (→Papers) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Public knowledge resources can make a good starting point, e.g. to identify interventions one can try and that are likely to work. This wiki can be a starting point by browsing topics of interest and visiting the links in the articles find basic common knowledge about a given topic from the perspective of health tracking. | + | {{Topic Infobox}} |
| + | Public knowledge resources can make a good starting point, e.g. to identify interventions one can try and that are likely to work. This wiki can be a starting point by browsing topics of interest and visiting the links in the articles find basic common knowledge about a given topic from the perspective of health tracking. | ||
| − | Additionally, it might be worth looking for more details or the cutting edge of science for interventions. Depending on the topic in question there might be communities which compile such detailed information, e.g. the communities [[Tools for Cognitive Testing|rNootropics]] and [[Diet tracking tools|rNutrition]] compile great lists of research conducted and advice. Depending on the topic and specific question, it may be bad to rely solely on epidemiological studies without looking at other types of studies.<ref>https://old.reddit.com/r/nutrition/comments/tby2ye/about_scientific_studies_on_nutrition_from_a/</ref> | + | The most reliable source of information (besides your doctor), is from the government.<ref>https://medlineplus.gov/</ref> When searching add 'site:.gov' to the end of your query. Wikipedia is less reliable. |
| + | |||
| + | Additionally, it might be worth looking for more details or the cutting edge of science for interventions. Or maybe not?<ref>https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/fFY2HeC9i2Tx8FEnK/my-resentful-story-of-becoming-a-medical-miracle</ref> Depending on the topic in question there might be communities which compile such detailed information, e.g. the communities [[Tools for Cognitive Testing|rNootropics]] and [[Diet tracking tools|rNutrition]] compile great lists of research conducted and advice. Formal research papers are difficult. Search for metanalyses because they are a compilation of other studies. Use advanced search tools like ontologies.<ref>www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/68008568</ref> Depending on the topic and specific question, it may be bad to rely solely on epidemiological studies without looking at other types of studies.<ref>https://old.reddit.com/r/nutrition/comments/tby2ye/about_scientific_studies_on_nutrition_from_a/</ref> | ||
See also [[Resources]] | See also [[Resources]] | ||
| Line 7: | Line 10: | ||
== Papers == | == Papers == | ||
https://www.lens.org | https://www.lens.org | ||
| + | |||
| + | chatgpt's scholarai | ||
https://elicit.org GPT-3 Powered. Transforms every sentence into every other relevant sentence so user does not need to rephrase anything. Also gives the exact sentence that answers the user's question. | https://elicit.org GPT-3 Powered. Transforms every sentence into every other relevant sentence so user does not need to rephrase anything. Also gives the exact sentence that answers the user's question. | ||
| Line 13: | Line 18: | ||
* Does mindfulness improve decision-making? | * Does mindfulness improve decision-making? | ||
* What are the effects of sleep training on infants? | * What are the effects of sleep training on infants? | ||
| − | https://www.semanticscholar.org | + | consensus.app like elicit. will also suggest citations for your statements. |
| + | |||
| + | https://www.semanticscholar.org the backend for consensus and elicit. | ||
https://www.scinapse.io | https://www.scinapse.io | ||
https://examine.com Search name of diet supplement get summary and all papers on the subject. recommended by LW guy too. | https://examine.com Search name of diet supplement get summary and all papers on the subject. recommended by LW guy too. | ||
| + | |||
| + | litmaps.com network graphs of citations | ||
| + | |||
| + | researchrabbit like litmaps | ||
| + | |||
| + | microsoft academic graph like litmaps | ||
== Knowledge Graphs == | == Knowledge Graphs == | ||
| − | Knowledge graphs link information through triplets. Nodes can be topics like "supplement", which could be connected to a node like "disease" with an edge that says "reduces chance". This would mean that some supplement reduces chance of some disease. The biomindmap.com tool is a "collaborative knowledge manager" <ref>[https://biomindmap.com/nodes/1399 https://biomindmap.com/nodes/620]</ref>. To contribute you must read the abstracts of the papers supporting each link. Be careful though, the highest rated herb for improving cognition actually reduces stress. | + | Knowledge graphs link information through triplets. Nodes can be topics like "supplement", which could be connected to a node like "disease" with an edge that says "reduces chance". This would mean that some supplement reduces chance of some disease. The biomindmap.com tool is a "collaborative knowledge manager" <ref>[https://biomindmap.com/nodes/1399 https://biomindmap.com/nodes/620]</ref>. To contribute you must read the abstracts of the papers supporting each link. Be careful though, the highest rated herb for improving cognition actually reduces stress. Curedao<ref>studies.curedao.org/variables/Cognitive_Speed_Score_From_Lumosity</ref> uses user contributed data instead of papers. |
=== Biomedical Knowledge Graphs === | === Biomedical Knowledge Graphs === | ||
| Line 32: | Line 45: | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Experiment design]] |
Latest revision as of 21:47, 14 December 2023
Topic Infobox 
| |
|---|---|
| Linked pages on this wiki | Tools (0), |
Public knowledge resources can make a good starting point, e.g. to identify interventions one can try and that are likely to work. This wiki can be a starting point by browsing topics of interest and visiting the links in the articles find basic common knowledge about a given topic from the perspective of health tracking.
The most reliable source of information (besides your doctor), is from the government.[1] When searching add 'site:.gov' to the end of your query. Wikipedia is less reliable.
Additionally, it might be worth looking for more details or the cutting edge of science for interventions. Or maybe not?[2] Depending on the topic in question there might be communities which compile such detailed information, e.g. the communities rNootropics and rNutrition compile great lists of research conducted and advice. Formal research papers are difficult. Search for metanalyses because they are a compilation of other studies. Use advanced search tools like ontologies.[3] Depending on the topic and specific question, it may be bad to rely solely on epidemiological studies without looking at other types of studies.[4]
See also Resources
Papers[edit | edit source]
chatgpt's scholarai
https://elicit.org GPT-3 Powered. Transforms every sentence into every other relevant sentence so user does not need to rephrase anything. Also gives the exact sentence that answers the user's question.
- What is the impact of creatine on cognition?
- Does mindfulness improve decision-making?
- What are the effects of sleep training on infants?
consensus.app like elicit. will also suggest citations for your statements.
https://www.semanticscholar.org the backend for consensus and elicit.
https://examine.com Search name of diet supplement get summary and all papers on the subject. recommended by LW guy too.
litmaps.com network graphs of citations
researchrabbit like litmaps
microsoft academic graph like litmaps
Knowledge Graphs[edit | edit source]
Knowledge graphs link information through triplets. Nodes can be topics like "supplement", which could be connected to a node like "disease" with an edge that says "reduces chance". This would mean that some supplement reduces chance of some disease. The biomindmap.com tool is a "collaborative knowledge manager" [5]. To contribute you must read the abstracts of the papers supporting each link. Be careful though, the highest rated herb for improving cognition actually reduces stress. Curedao[6] uses user contributed data instead of papers.
Biomedical Knowledge Graphs[edit | edit source]
These knowledge graphs are designed for researchers, doctors and precision medicine[7] and not specifically for Personal Science and might be harder to navigate. These graph databases mention their sources of information like "clinicaltrials.gov".
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ https://medlineplus.gov/
- ↑ https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/fFY2HeC9i2Tx8FEnK/my-resentful-story-of-becoming-a-medical-miracle
- ↑ www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/68008568
- ↑ https://old.reddit.com/r/nutrition/comments/tby2ye/about_scientific_studies_on_nutrition_from_a/
- ↑ https://biomindmap.com/nodes/620
- ↑ studies.curedao.org/variables/Cognitive_Speed_Score_From_Lumosity
- ↑ https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.12.21253461v3.full
- ↑ https://het.io/search/?source=15633&target=26528&metapaths=BPpGaDrD%2CBPpGuD&complete=
- ↑ http://www.fudan-pgx.org/premedkb/index.html#/search/result?queryType=1&metaType=disease&keyword=3410
- ↑ https://ckg.readthedocs.io/en/latest/INTRO.html
- ↑ https://github.com/wcm-wanglab/iBKH