Editing Statistical testing

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 
== Limitations ==
 
== Limitations ==
Many forms of statistical testing only aim to answer whether it is likely that any observed differences, correlations etc. are ''statistically significant'', that is how unlikely is it these results are the outcome of chance. These don't say how ''significant'' in a broader sense – for example for the impact or effect size – the results are<ref>https://atrium.lib.uoguelph.ca/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10214/1869/A_Statistical_versus_Practical_Significance.pdf</ref>. In [[genetic testing]] extreme examples of this can be found: Individual genetic variants can be strongly statistically significant which are very unlikely to be the result of chance. At the same time the observed effect of a genetic variant frequently only increases e.g. the risk for a disease by a fraction of a percent<ref>https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/164/7/609/62895</ref>.  
+
Many forms of statistical testing only aim to answer whether it is likely that any observed differences, correlations etc. are ''statistically significant'', that is how unlikely is it these results are the outcome of chance. These don't say how ''significant'' in a broader sense – for example for the impact or effect size – the results are<ref>https://atrium.lib.uoguelph.ca/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10214/1869/A_Statistical_versus_Practical_Significance.pdf</ref>. In [[genetic testing]] extreme examples of this can be found: Individual genetic variants can be strongly statistically significant which are very unlikely to be the result of chance. At the same time the observed effect of a genetic variant frequently only increases e.g. the risk for a disease by a fraction of a percent.  
  
 
As personal science is often concerned with observing effects that have a real-world impact, statistical testing and statistical significance alone should be considered only one tool in the personal science toolkit. [[Data visualization|Visualizing data]] can be a very powerful first step to explore if there are visible differences or correlations in ones data. If those visualizations seem to show a large effect, statistical testing can be used to evaluate how 'trustworthy' those effects are.  
 
As personal science is often concerned with observing effects that have a real-world impact, statistical testing and statistical significance alone should be considered only one tool in the personal science toolkit. [[Data visualization|Visualizing data]] can be a very powerful first step to explore if there are visible differences or correlations in ones data. If those visualizations seem to show a large effect, statistical testing can be used to evaluate how 'trustworthy' those effects are.  

Please note that all contributions to Personal Science Wiki are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (see PersonalScienceWiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Templates used on this page: