Editing Talk:Finding relations between variables in time series

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 132: Line 132:
  
 
https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.15598 !!! Disease prediction with ML. heterogeneity complex factors at the individual level.  phase diagram
 
https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.15598 !!! Disease prediction with ML. heterogeneity complex factors at the individual level.  phase diagram
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequential_pattern_mining
 
 
https://old.reddit.com/r/QuantifiedSelf/comments/wfuy03/personalized_digital_health_and_medicine_at_jsm/  "the g-formula (i.e., standardization, back-door adjustment) under serial interfer-
 
ence. It estimates stable recurring effects, as is done in n-of-1 trials and single case experimental designs. We
 
compare our approach to standard methods (with possible confounding) to show how to use causal inference
 
to make better personalized recommendations for health behavior change, "
 
 
https://www.gwern.net/Replication crisis easy nice read. Since will be data dredging eventually and making stats test this useful.
 
 
https://old.reddit.com/r/wearables/comments/xmn06r/using_wearables_and_apps_to_characterize_your_own/" Well, the experimental design of n-of-1 trials and SCEDs actually checks for causation, not just correlation. This is why randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in clinical research are a gold-standard technique for figuring out if a new intervention or treatment actually works. “Flipping the coin” in a way balances everything else that might confuse or “confound” the way the treatment might impact the health-related outcome."
 
 
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/9kNxhKWvixtKW5anS/you-are-not-measuring-what-you-think-you-are-measuring 2 rules- takeways You are not measuring what you think you are measuring but enough data sources and types of things you measure you may find out what that is.
 
 
https://gitlab.unige.ch/qol IMPORTANT
 
 
also eric j daza 's papers.
 
 
 
== funny on this stat analysis ==
 
 
https://xkcd.com/2560/
 
 
== Quick write I made here for later. ==
 
 
Collection is really just a matter of finding the right devices and taking the time to use them. Analysis outside of immediate obvious effect can become difficult. If the effect is subtle and drowned in other effects, or hard to measure. If the intervention is not something user can easily or wants to reproduce.  If the effect take long time to build up, or is shifted in time from intervention. If the successful effect only happens under several conditions or several interventions together. If the spray and pray approach is dangerous. If the spray and pray approach only hits gold once in  a while. Multiple comparison problem (see wikipedia).  If user is bad at keeping records. There are probably more. There are many many apps that just do correlation and none that do anything more.  Here is a list of both problems and apps.
 
 
== new section : single variable validity ==
 
 
how to prove that what you are measuring really is what you are trying to measure. aka construct validation
 
 
quick way; compare to a scientifically validated standard.
 
 
also consider en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convergent_validity many tests all agree more or less and "divergent validity" they do not correlate with things that they should not
 
 
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nomological_network several constructs and their relationships to each other such as ageing causes memory loss
 
 
== some more thoughts ==
 
 
stats.stackexchange.com/questions/264225/finding-brief-repeated-patterns-in-a-time-series the question is not answered but in the side bar similar questions are well answered. Copulas may be important? The difference between time series and non-time series seems to be that with time series the patterns are cyclical, not a specific type of pattern/shape that happens every so often. Health tracking data seems to need both. I imagine blood sugar spike after meals but meals are not eaten at constant time. Long term trend and smoothing is covered in some Arima like models. Also changepoint which is like trend but in shorter time. And outliers? THat is like changepoint. results in a pretty visualization illustration of a single time series. If any of the apps were serious this would appear there.
 
Maybe multiple moving averages www.investopedia.com/terms/g/guppy-multiple-moving-average.asp as which kernel width fits best. Maybe ecg decomposition with DWT and ICA
 
This all called: single subject longitudinal analysis . how about Temporal Dynamics?
 
 
== research chat suggests  ==
 
 
look at the extremes of the predictor variables; like three day long terrible sleep and three day long good sleep and compare cognitive ability
 
 
== another aggregator ==
 
 
www.opencures.org
 
 
apps.apple.com/us/app/this-that/id1660363624
 
 
== Series analysis is not it ==
 
 
Old concept about constantly doing old school statistical testing to know when there is enough data to stop something like a clinical trial.
 

Please note that all contributions to Personal Science Wiki are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (see PersonalScienceWiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)