1,683
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 18:
Line 18: +
→Should this be a topic page?
== Should this be a topic page? ==
== Should this be a topic page? ==
I noticed that these types of pages (those that contain collections of tools on a certain topic) are sometimes in the "tools" and sometimes in the "topics" category. The topic page that this page has as a property in the tool infobox redirects back to this page. I'd suggest changing it to a topic page, also as there is no other topic page on heart rate yet (only HRV). Title suggestion: "Heart rate and pulse tracking". What do you think? [[User:Katoss|Katoss]] ([[User talk:Katoss|talk]]) 16:26, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
I noticed that these types of pages (those that contain collections of tools on a certain topic) are sometimes in the "tools" and sometimes in the "topics" category. The topic page that this page has as a property in the tool infobox redirects back to this page. I'd suggest changing it to a topic page, also as there is no other topic page on heart rate yet (only HRV). Title suggestion: "Heart rate and pulse tracking". What do you think? [[User:Katoss|Katoss]] ([[User talk:Katoss|talk]]) 16:26, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
: HRV and HR are actually very similar. HRV is practically the better more advanced HR. These pages should probably be merged? Also I do not know if Pulse is really that necessary as part of the title. It definitely should be in the page and maybe redirecting to it. I imagine a new user looking for a tool, going to tools section and almost immediately finding the "tools for" subsection. Actually they would probably use search. I am ok with moving "Tools For" to topics but please leave the "Tools For" subcategory by not removing the phrase for the titles. [[User:DG|DG]] ([[User talk:DG|talk]]) 20:48, 28 September 2022 (UTC)