Difference between revisions of "Talk:Reasons for and against self tracking and quantification"

From Personal Science Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
So I think there should be things all people always track in case something goes wrong. Doctors already track weight and blood pressure every visit. Resting heart rate is a great example as the most common wearable, the smart watch already tracks it. Some possible suggestions would be mood, symptoms and a few cognitive tests. What do you think?
 
So I think there should be things all people always track in case something goes wrong. Doctors already track weight and blood pressure every visit. Resting heart rate is a great example as the most common wearable, the smart watch already tracks it. Some possible suggestions would be mood, symptoms and a few cognitive tests. What do you think?
 +
 +
== Should I put this in? problems with st saving money ==
 +
 +
Right after "self tracking saves money" add "Self tracking might push all the work onto the user and push away the doctor, but that is probably speculation."

Revision as of 02:09, 10 July 2022

-

potential sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_enhancement

what qualifies as "vitals" and a page

So I think there should be things all people always track in case something goes wrong. Doctors already track weight and blood pressure every visit. Resting heart rate is a great example as the most common wearable, the smart watch already tracks it. Some possible suggestions would be mood, symptoms and a few cognitive tests. What do you think?

Should I put this in? problems with st saving money

Right after "self tracking saves money" add "Self tracking might push all the work onto the user and push away the doctor, but that is probably speculation."