Difference between revisions of "Talk:Reasons for and against self tracking and quantification"
(→Should I put this in? problems with st saving money: new section) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_enhancement | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_enhancement | ||
| + | |||
| + | Abhik: I worry about this tension when trying to do "proof of concept" and how it's much more difficult to do this with relevant people that might benefit – easier to get data from potentially less informative populations | ||
| + | |||
| + | <nowiki>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34775507/</nowiki> | ||
== what qualifies as "vitals" and a page == | == what qualifies as "vitals" and a page == | ||
Revision as of 20:08, 14 July 2022
-
potential sources
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_enhancement
Abhik: I worry about this tension when trying to do "proof of concept" and how it's much more difficult to do this with relevant people that might benefit – easier to get data from potentially less informative populations
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34775507/
what qualifies as "vitals" and a page
So I think there should be things all people always track in case something goes wrong. Doctors already track weight and blood pressure every visit. Resting heart rate is a great example as the most common wearable, the smart watch already tracks it. Some possible suggestions would be mood, symptoms and a few cognitive tests. What do you think?
Should I put this in? problems with st saving money
Right after "self tracking saves money" add "Self tracking might push all the work onto the user and push away the doctor, but that is probably speculation."