Changes

Line 30: Line 30:  
== Topics related to topics ==
 
== Topics related to topics ==
 
We got rid of circular, semantic linking as it was hard to understand the dependencies of how information shows up. I feel for topics it could still be relevant and useful to have 'topics related to this topic'. Where I noticed this was when making the [[Statistical testing]] page, where I'd have loved to have the [[Is it chance? Use a T-Test to identify how likely an intervention worked|t-test page]] linked back. Do we think this might be useful and doable? - [[User:Gedankenstuecke|Gedankenstuecke]] ([[User talk:Gedankenstuecke|talk]]) 10:20, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 
We got rid of circular, semantic linking as it was hard to understand the dependencies of how information shows up. I feel for topics it could still be relevant and useful to have 'topics related to this topic'. Where I noticed this was when making the [[Statistical testing]] page, where I'd have loved to have the [[Is it chance? Use a T-Test to identify how likely an intervention worked|t-test page]] linked back. Do we think this might be useful and doable? - [[User:Gedankenstuecke|Gedankenstuecke]] ([[User talk:Gedankenstuecke|talk]]) 10:20, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 +
: Disambiguation page with theses two and [[finding]] too and linking from these pages back up to the disambiguation.
    
== Organization of this talk page ==
 
== Organization of this talk page ==
Line 42: Line 43:     
: This could be interesting to identify clusters that could become new sub-topics. I think, right now, we might not have enough pages to create a lot of insight (maybe I'm wrong). But if someone wants to go ahead and try this, please go ahead (for context, linking here the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p61Zp48JXYxc5tB2q7WR51ZQ8_TS0s8-LDtvVSC88QA/edit#heading=h.vb8wvcdaoell notes of the self research chat on Feb 24, 2022] in which we talked about this) - [[User:Katoss|Katoss]] ([[User talk:Katoss|talk]]) 14:07, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 
: This could be interesting to identify clusters that could become new sub-topics. I think, right now, we might not have enough pages to create a lot of insight (maybe I'm wrong). But if someone wants to go ahead and try this, please go ahead (for context, linking here the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p61Zp48JXYxc5tB2q7WR51ZQ8_TS0s8-LDtvVSC88QA/edit#heading=h.vb8wvcdaoell notes of the self research chat on Feb 24, 2022] in which we talked about this) - [[User:Katoss|Katoss]] ([[User talk:Katoss|talk]]) 14:07, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Improve getting started ==
 +
 +
[[User:DG|DG]] suggested adding the [[Special:MostLinkedPages|Most Linked Pages]] to the "Getting started" front page section as those are pages that might be highly relevant for newcomers. I think that might be a good idea, how do others feel about it? - [[User:Gedankenstuecke|Gedankenstuecke]] ([[User talk:Gedankenstuecke|talk]]) 10:06, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
 +
 +
== night vision like gwern.net ==
 +
 +
Gwern's site has nifty "night mode" that makes text white on black. Can Wikimedia wiki do that?
1,683

edits