Editing Talk:Is it chance? Use a T-Test to identify how likely an intervention worked
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
: Given that standard t-tests like this aren't really used for time series (or at least not in the way described here) I'd keep it separate for now, but we could think about a larger 'meta'-topic about statistical testing? - [[User:Gedankenstuecke|Gedankenstuecke]] ([[User talk:Gedankenstuecke|talk]]) 09:02, 4 March 2022 (UTC) | : Given that standard t-tests like this aren't really used for time series (or at least not in the way described here) I'd keep it separate for now, but we could think about a larger 'meta'-topic about statistical testing? - [[User:Gedankenstuecke|Gedankenstuecke]] ([[User talk:Gedankenstuecke|talk]]) 09:02, 4 March 2022 (UTC) | ||
− | :: Start with an explanation of T-tests | + | :: Start with an explanation of T-tests then why they do not work then solutions. [[User:DG|DG]] ([[User talk:DG|talk]]) |
::: I think I'll just go ahead and make a [[Statistical testing]] page as a general introduction to the topic and link to the time series & t-testing pages. - [[User:Gedankenstuecke|Gedankenstuecke]] ([[User talk:Gedankenstuecke|talk]]) 10:09, 7 March 2022 (UTC) | ::: I think I'll just go ahead and make a [[Statistical testing]] page as a general introduction to the topic and link to the time series & t-testing pages. - [[User:Gedankenstuecke|Gedankenstuecke]] ([[User talk:Gedankenstuecke|talk]]) 10:09, 7 March 2022 (UTC) |