Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 49: Line 49:     
The p-value in this example, <code>0.24</code>, is above <code>0.05</code> and therefore we will assume that any difference in sleep between the nights is due to pure chance.
 
The p-value in this example, <code>0.24</code>, is above <code>0.05</code> and therefore we will assume that any difference in sleep between the nights is due to pure chance.
 +
 +
=== t-tests in R ===
 +
You can do the same t-test in the statistical programming language [[R]], using the same example:
 +
 +
<pre>
 +
melatonin <- c(8.53,7.64,7.26,7.53,7.85) # load intervention data
 +
no_melatonin <- c(7.91,7.7,7.7,7.13,7.62,7.51) # load control data
 +
 +
t.test(melatonin,no_melatonin,alternative='greater',paired=FALSE) # run the t-test
 +
</pre>
 +
 +
First we load both data series into R and then run the actual t-test. With <code>alternative='greater'</code> we specify a one-sided t-test in which we test whether the values of the intervention data are larger than those of the control. Alternatively we could have chosen <code>alternative='less'</code> or <code>alternative='two.sided'</code>. With <code>paired=FALSE</code> we specify that these are independent, non-paired samples.
 +
 +
Running our test results in the following output:
 +
 +
<pre>
 +
Welch Two Sample t-test
 +
 +
data:  melatonin and no_melatonin
 +
t = 0.69689, df = 5.9576, p-value = 0.2561
 +
alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is greater than 0
 +
95 percent confidence interval:
 +
-0.2992509        Inf
 +
sample estimates:
 +
mean of x mean of y
 +
    7.762    7.595
 +
</pre>
 +
 +
We see that <code>p-value = 0.2561</code>, indicating that the sleep-duration when taking melatonin is not substantially larger compared to the control and that any differences are likely just by chance.
 +
    
== Limitations ==
 
== Limitations ==

Navigation menu